DISTRIBUTED EDUCATION & INSTRUCTIONAL
TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE
Present:
Ann Adams, Linda Carroll, Phil Krolick, Marlene Propst, Lori Rowton, Alan
Heywood, Diane Watson, Dael Dixon, Chareane Wimbley-Gouveia, Carol Schaafsma,
Linda Kihs, Jim Hart, Raza Kahn, Rob Lewis, Mike Holland, and James Crawford
(student representative).
Welcome and Introductions: Linda Carroll introduced herself and Phil Krolick as this year¹s co-chairs for DEIT. She asked Ann Adams to provide a brief overview of what the DEIT committee does. Ann shared that DEIT (Distributed Education & Instructional Technology) started out as an informal committee, essentially focused on the idea of ³what can the web do for us². Over time, the committee became official by incorporating policies and procedures, and began its first offerings of online classes to students. Through this committee¹s efforts, several sub-committees were formed to gain a broader sense of the distance learning needs for staff/students, and as a result, there are now a variety of online student services, course management software, and multiple online course offerings.
DEIT
Subcommittee Reports:
q
Technology Initiatives Committee (Linda Carroll). Linda
reports that this committee had been working on an appraisal method for
evaluating face-to-face courses vs. online courses. They evaluated the TLT-Flashlight appraisal method, a reflective
teacher¹s tool that aids in self-evaluation for instructors, decided that it
wouldn¹t work well for our purposes.
The faculty self-appraisal as well as the student appraisal for online
classes still needs more work.
This is an ongoing project.
q
Training Subcommittee (Ann Adams). Ann highlighted
that on-going training opportunities have been provided by Information Services
staff. One-hour workshops are
being offered throughout the year, which include Blackboard basics training,
digital cameras, scanning, and multi-media lecterns. She also noted that she has been providing tech tips via
email so that staff have a quick resource to common questions about a variety
of technology issues. Eventually,
these tech tips will be posted to a web page for user accessibility.
q
Web Presence
(Marlene Propst). Marlene
reports that this committee has been very active working on web projects campus
wide, by working closely with Media staff to complete their goals. The committee plans to meet once a
month, and has already put their goals together for this year. Many of these projects are for
enhancing online student services.
She reminded the committee that they had brought in a web consultant,
Alan Koch, to assist with the college¹s ongoing effort to improve on web
presentation and delivery, while maintaining a standard of consistency
throughout the LBCC website. She
noted that Kate Johnson is working on finding a tool (template) that will help
make each web site unique to LBCC, without having to individually edit each web
page. Ann Adams added that is a
future hope that each department will have these tools available to make changes
to their web pages.
q
Student Services
(Diane Watson). Diane told
the committee that as result of achieving this sub-committee¹s second five-year
plan, almost all student services are now on the web, including various student
forms. They plan to continue to
work on making it better by working closely with web presence committee
members. There is ongoing
discussion for developing a web site for a ³virtual Career Center², and an
online Turning Points Transitions program that would assist students in how to
get started at LBCC.
q
Technology Infrastructure (Alan Heywood). Alan
noted that this sub-committee has already met once this fall, and gave a brief
overview of newly submitted fall projects. He stated that 2004-2005 projects are a bit behind due
to college-wide remodels, fires, thefts and a vacant media technician
position. This committee will plan
to continue to take requests once a term throughout the year, which is a change
from reviewing requests once each spring.
New
Directions: In an effort to revitalize membership, Phil
encouraged full-committee members to recruit a co-worker and together find a
sub-committee they would like to contribute too,.
Strategic
Planning and taking stock: Carol Schaafsma reminded committee
members that DEIT grants are available to part-time and contracted faculty for
the development of distance learning courses (i.e. online, hybrid, ITV) through
the Staff Organizational Office.
Ann mentioned that she, Phil Krolick, Linda Carroll and Alan Heywood met
to discuss whether or not distributive education (DEIT) has a stated goal that
is leading our technology in a particular direction. She suggested that maybe the committee should consider
creating a new sub-committee to review and research this, or possibly start
with some type of self-assessment from committee members and instructors using
the technology. Mike Holland added
that he hoped the committee would come up with two really key ³directives² by
the end of the year that would answer ³what are we building toward² and makes a
substantial contribution to the college.
Diane addressed several key issues to be considered in creating goals
for DEIT: 1. Do we want to develop programs online? 2. What are our goals for
teaching distance education courses? 3. Is the technology in the classroom a
goal? 4. Is providing services online a goal?
Phil
asked if the Technology Initiatives sub-committee should be the committee to
work on creating the goals and mission statements. Linda Carroll supported the idea, and will report back this
commitment to her sub-committee. On a final note, Alan Heywood recommend that
we ³remember the audience² when we make these decisions and goals for the
future direction of DEIT.
NEXT MEETING: Winter 2004